Closantel toxicity
- Eimear O Leary ,
- Sara Gasior and
- Elizabeth McElnea
- Ophthalmology, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
- Correspondence to Dr Eimear O Leary; eimoleary1912@gmail.com
Abstract
Closantel is a broad-spectrum antihelminthic agent. It is a veterinary drug used only in animals—usually cattle, sheep and goats. A man in his 60s accidentally ingested approximately 1500 mg closantel. His visual acuity deteriorated. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed disruption of the outer retinal layers. Electroretinography identified abnormalities in macula and inner retinal function. He received methylprednisolone 1 g daily intravenously for 3 days. Improvements in both his visual acuity and OCT appearance followed. This case illustrates the profoundly destructive effect of this drug on humans even when consumed in low dose. We provide a concise summary of the small number of cases of closantel toxicity in humans, previously reported, for future reference as needed by others.
Background
Closantel is a broad-spectrum antihelminthic agent used against several species and developmental stages of parasitic worm—nematodes and trematodes.1 A halogenated salicylanilide, closantel inhibits the coupling between electron transport and phosphorylation reactions, that is, oxidative phosphorylation, and thereby disrupts mitochondrial ATP production to impair parasite membrane transport mechanisms, motility and probably other processes.2 It is a veterinary drug used only in animals—cattle, sheep and goats predominantly. Its use is contraindicated in humans.3
The recommended oral dose of closantel for sheep is 7.5–10.0 mg/kg and for cattle is 10.0–15.0 mg/kg. In humans, an acceptable daily intake of closantel is thought to be ≤0.03 mg/kg. The recommended maximum residue of closantel in food products in the edible tissues of sheep is 1.5 mg/kg, and in cattle is 0.5 mg/kg for muscles, 2.0 mg/kg for kidneys and 1.0 mg/kg for liver.4
Several cases of toxicity and mortality due to closantel ingestion in animals have been reported.5–7 Closantel is neurotoxic, ophthalmotoxic and hepatotoxic in animals in overdose.5–7
Following oral intake in animals, the peak plasma concentration of closantel is reached in 8–48 hours. Its tissue distribution is limited by its strong protein binding—99.9%—to plasma albumin. It is, for the most part, eliminated unmetabolised, in faeces, with a half-life of 2–3 weeks.8 The pharmacokinetics of closantel in humans are unknown.8 The unique pharmacokinetic features of closantel in animals—rapid parenteral absorption and long elimination half-life—may however play important roles in its toxicity in both animals and humans.9
In the central nervous system, white matter and spinal cord ‘spongiosis’ are the most significant histopathological findings in cases of closantel toxicity in animals.10 These changes are symmetrical and affect the optic radiation, the periventricular white matter, the thalamic nuclei, the brainstem and the cerebellar peduncles. Optic nerve damage is thought due to the development of oedema within the surrounding myelin sheath and resultant compression of the nerve within the osseous portion of its course resulting in degeneration, fibrosis and subsequent atrophy.11 In the retina, closantel toxicity leads to necrosis and apoptosis of the outer retinal layers, in particular, the photoreceptor cells.12 Closantel can also cause fatty change and hepatocellular degeneration in the liver.13
Case presentation
A man in his 60s presented to the Eye Casualty describing a progressive deterioration in his night vision over the 10 days that followed his accidental ingestion of approximately 30 mL of a solution containing 50 mg/1 mL closantel, that is, 1500 mg and 75 mg/1 mL, that is, 2205 mg mebendazole intended for oral administration to his sheep.
He had a history of hypertension, nasal polyps, hiatus hernia, Barrett’s oesophagus, diverticular disease and varicose veins. His medications were perindopril and lercanidipine. He had a 40 pack-year history of cigarette smoking and consumed six units of alcohol weekly.
Right visual acuity (VA) was 6/45 unaided and 6/30 with pinhole (PH). Left VA was 6/30 unaided and 6/24 with PH. He could not read any of the Ishihara colour vision plates with either eye. No further abnormalities were noted at ophthalmic clinical examination. Systemic examination inclusive of a complete neurological examination was normal.
Investigations
Humphrey visual fields 30-2 with 10/17 fixation losses bilaterally could not be reliably interpreted. As can be seen from figure 1A,B, optical coherence tomography (OCT) displayed disruption of the outer retinal layers—the retinal pigment epithelium, the outer photoreceptor layer, the junction of the inner and outer photoreceptor segments, the inner photoreceptor layer and the external limiting membrane, at the macula bilaterally. Fundus autofluorescence at the macula and fundus fluorescein angiography were normal. Full blood count, and liver and renal function tests did not identify any abnormality.
Optical coherence tomography displayed disruption of the outer retinal layers—the retinal pigment epithelium, the outer photoreceptor layer, the junction of the inner and outer photoreceptor segments, the inner photoreceptor layer and the external limiting membrane, at the macula of the right (A) and left (B) eyes. Following treatment with methylprednisolone 1 g daily intravenously for 3 days, the disruption of the outer retinal layers is reduced so that each of the aforementioned layers is identifiable at the macula of the right (C) and left (D) eyes.
At full-field electroretinography (ERG), both rod and cone-isolated responses were delayed and of reduced amplitude bilaterally. Pattern ERG indicated compromised macula and inner retinal function bilaterally. Pattern visual evoked response showed normal P100 latencies but a reduction in amplitude of the response.
Treatment
This case was discussed with the National Poisons Information Centre. The patient was admitted to the medical assessment unit where he received methylprednisolone 1 g daily intravenously for 3 days and two doses of Pabrinex I, II and IV, each containing thiamine hydrochloride 250 mg, riboflavin 4 mg, pyridoxine hydrochloride 50 mg, ascorbic acid 500 mg, nicotinamide 160 mg and glucose 1000 mg. He was discharged to take prednisolone 60 mg daily tapering by 10 mg daily every 5 days thereafter.
Outcome and follow-up
Objective improvements in visual acuity were recorded, so the day following completion of intravenous methylprednisolone, right VA was 6/6 and left VA was 6/7.5. Improvements were also noted in the appearance of the macula bilaterally at OCT. At review 6 months following his initial presentation, this man’s VA remains unchanged.
Discussion
Closantel poisoning in humans can occur from the consumption of milk and/or meat from animals treated with the drug, by accident or misuse.9 The volume of closantel ingested was estimated based on the patient’s history of having swallowed two mouthfuls of the same—approximately 15 mL each. Mebendazole was also ingested. It has been used safely to treat human central nervous system infections and was not expected to have an effect.
In Lithuania, in 1993, donated closantel was mistakenly given to 11 women to treat endometritis.14 15 A summary of those cases of closantel poisoning in humans previously described is given in table 1.3 8 9 15–21
Previously reported cases of closantel poisoning
Case | Gender | Age in years | Origin | Reason given for consumption | Dose | Time to presentation | Symptoms | Ocular signs | Abnormalities in systemic investigations | Right, left eye visual acuity at presentation unless otherwise stated | Right, left eye visual acuity at time after presentation unless otherwise stated | Treatment | Reference |
1 | Male | 20s | India | Mistaken for cough syrup | 2250 mg | 3 days | Sudden painless defective vision | Mild temporal optic disc pallor | CF, CF | 6/9, 6/9 at 1 month | Methylprednisolone 1 g daily IV for 3 days followed by prednisolone 40 mg orally daily and tapered | 17 | |
2 | Male | 30s | Iran | Accidental ingestion | 1500 mg | 10 days | Progressive loss of vision; mild headache |
Left optic disc swelling | Normocytic, normochromic anaemia with serum HgB 11 g/L; increase in ALT and AST more than 2× |
PL, NPL | NPL, NPL at 26 days | Methylprednisolone 1 g daily IV for 3 days followed by prednisolone 1 mg/kg orally for 2 weeks Erythropoietin 20 000 units daily IV for 3 days |
3 |
3 | Male | 50s | Iran | For sore throat, as an antibiotic | 1000 mg 15.15 mg/kg | 14 days | Sudden vision loss in both eyes | Mid-dilated, poorly reactive pupils; mild peripapillary whitening and right>left eye nerve fibre layer oedema | Liver enzyme test 2× normal range; multiple bright foci at periventricular and paraventricular, centrum semiovale and junctional areas at MRI brain, T2 weighted without gadolinium | CF, CF | CF, CF | Methylprednisolone 1 g daily IV for 3 days Erythropoietin 10 000 IU two times per day for 3 days |
18 |
4 | Male | 40s | Iran | Mistaken for another medicine | 1000 mg 15.87 mg/kg | 4 hours | Dizziness; nausea; progressive vision loss | Mild optic disc swelling bilaterally | 20/200, 20/200 3 days after ingestion HM, HM 14 days after ingestion |
20/20, 20/20 28 days after ingestion 20/20, 20/20 3 years after ingestion |
Gastric lavage 4 hours after ingestion Methylprednisolone 250 mg IV once for 5 days after ingestion |
19 | |
5 | Male | 50s | Germany | Helminth fearing | 1800 mg over 3 days | 4 days | Visual impairment; tongue dysesthesia |
20/63, 20/50 HM, HM 3 days later |
20/25, 20/25 | Five sessions on alternate days therapeutic membrane plasma exchange with the OctaNova system Diamed Medizintechnik using a Plasmaflo OP-08W(L) filter (Asahi Kasei Kuraray Medical Co) A 1.5 plasma volume exchange was performed using human albumin 20 g/100 mL and crytalloids in a 20%–80% distribution, respectively, as placement |
8 | ||
6 | Male | 50s | Germany | On purpose to treat himself | 1800 mg over 3 days | ‘Several’ days | Scotomata in both visual fields | ‘Complete vision loss’ at 10 days after presentation | 60% of vision regained at 6 weeks | Plasmapheresis more than 1 week after ingestion | 20 | ||
7 | – | 40s | Morocco | Accidental ingestion | Unknown amount | 7 days | Blindness | Normal fundus | Unknown Lost to follow-up | 16 | |||
8 | – | 40s | Morocco | To treat intestinal parasitosis | Unknown amount | 7 days | Blindness | Normal fundus | Unknown Lost to follow-up | 16 | |||
9 | Female | 20s | Iran | Inadvertently dispensed as an alternative to triclabendazole | 3000 mg 500 mg two times per day for 3 days |
3 days | Bilateral blurred vision; bilateral decreased colour vision | Sluggish pupillary reaction to light; bilateral pale optic disc |
HM, HM | 20/30, 20/30 at both 18 months and 2.5 years | Methylprednisolone 1 g daily IV for 3 days Plasmapheresis commenced on the third day of drug ingestion Five sessions completed |
21 | |
10 | Female | Early childhood | Morocco | Accidental ingestion | Unknown amount | 1 day | Blindness | Bilateral mydriasis with abolition of pupillary reflex; severe papilloedema |
Regained vision after 2 months | Oral vitamins B1, B6 and B12 | 16 | ||
11 | Female | Early childhood | Morocco | Mistaken administration | 4000 mg 500 mg daily for 8 days |
4 | Acute blindness | Bilateral mydriasis with loss of pupillary light reflex and absence of blinking to threat bilateral papilloedema |
Normocytic, normochromic anaemia with HgB 10.7 mg/L; AST 120 IU/L; 52% increase PT; 1.3× prolongation of aPTT; CK 904 IU/L; leucocytosis with lymphocytic predominance |
‘Partial recovery’ at 2 months Advised to attend school for visually impaired children |
Glucocorticoids, vitamin B12 and vitamin K | 9 | |
12 | Female | 20s | Lithuania | Mistaken administration to treat endometritis | Not stated | 7 days | Blurred vision; photopsia |
20/250, 20/250 | 20/63, 20/200 at 22 years | 15 | |||
13 | Female | 20s | Lithuania | Mistaken administration to treat endometritis | Not stated | 3 days | Haze; black spots |
20/32, 20/63 | 20/25 20/40 at 22 years |
15 | |||
14 | Female | 20s | Lithuania | Mistaken administration to treat endometritis | Not stated | 5 days | Blurred vision; decrease in vision | 20/32, 20/20 | 20/20, 20/20 at 22 years | 15 | |||
15 | Female | 30s | Lithuania | Mistaken administration to treat endometritis | Not stated | 1 day | Blurred vision | 20/20, 20/20 | 20/40, 20/40 at 22 years | 15 | |||
16 | Female | 20s | Lithuania | Mistaken administration to treat endometritis | Not stated | 3 days | Photopsia | 20/20, 20/20 | 20/25, 20/25 at 22 years | 15 |
-
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CF, counting fingers; CK, creatine kinase; HgB, haemoglobin; HM, hand movements; IV, intravenously; NPL, no perception of light; PL, perception of light; PT, prothrombin time.
The onset of deterioration in vision following closantel ingestion has been variable. Consequently, as in the case we describe here, it may be difficult for patients to relate their ingestion of often small quantities of this drug to a subacute deterioration in their vision later.
Optic nerve involvement ranging from blurring of the optic disc margins and unilateral or bilateral optic disc oedema in the acute stage to optic disc atrophy later has been described.3 9 16 18 19 21 Outer retinal layer thinning with spicule-like hyperpigmentation owing to the involvement of photoreceptor and retinal pigment epithelium layers15 may well be a relatively late finding.
In many cases, as here, there may be few, if any, clinical signs, making the diagnosis of closantel poisoning challenging. OCT and visual field testing, both of which can be performed rapidly, are widely available, are non-invasive and inexpensive as these investigations are most helpful in making the diagnosis along with electrophysiology studies if available.
Five of those Lithuanian women mistakenly given closantel were re-examined 22 years later.15 Drug-induced changes in visual acuity were found to be partially reversible improving in three affected women but deteriorating in two. Visual field defects worsened over time. Peripheral retinal thinning and pigmentation were found in all five of these women. Thus, closantel likely has long-lasting negative effects on the human retina.15
There is currently no antidote or specific treatment for closantel poisoning in humans. As the drug binds to plasma albumin, plasmapheresis has been used in the management of three previously reported cases of human ingestion of this drug.8 20 21 Its utility in this regard may be greatest in those patients who present early following drug ingestion—those patients presenting 3 and 4 days after having taken closantel8 21 recovered and had better vision than those patients presenting 7 days after having done the same.20 Interestingly, none of these reports8 20 21 detail the amount of closantel removed by plasmapheresis.
Better visual outcome after treatment with systemic steroids has also been reported.17 19 21 Inflammation likely mediates, to some degree, the toxic effects of closantel. Relatively, early initiation of steroid treatment may limit this inflammation.19 Poorer outcomes in other cases treated similarly3 18 have been ascribed to late patient presentation and in turn the late commencement of steroid treatment. Unfortunately, there is no evidence beyond that provided by case reports17 19 21 to support the use of systemic steroids in human closantel toxicity.
That patient who underwent plasmapheresis and received methylprednisolone 1 g daily intravenously for 3 days slowly regained vision, so 18 months after poisoning, she had VA of 20/30 bilaterally, having only been able to perceive hand movements at presentation.21
It may be also that visual outcomes are related to the dose per body weight of closantel ingested. In animals exposed to lower doses of the drug, visual recovery is greater.6 In the case described by Tabatabaei et al, the time to presentation and the quantity of closantel ingested—though not necessarily the dose per body weight—were the same as those described here and yet the outcome differed greatly.3
Individual responses to drug ingestion may be variable. A direct toxic effect of the drug on neural and retinal tissues, rather than the host inflammatory response, might be another alternative explanation for treatment failure.3 In the case described, as in others, it cannot of course be excluded that the improvement in vision noted represented the normal course of poisoning.
Closantel is neurotoxic in animals. Consequently, Pabrinex I and II containing the aforementioned and with established effectiveness in the treatment of encephalopathy—particularly Wernicke’s encephalopathy—was administered in the hope of avoiding this. Two other reports9 16 detail the administration of vitamins B1, B6, B12 and vitamin K to patients who have taken closantel.
Learning points
-
This case alerts us to the risk of drugs not approved for human use.
-
It indicates the profoundly destructive effect of this drug on humans even in low dose.3
-
Increased public health awareness about the toxicity of this drug is warranted.
-
Accidents such as that described here should be preventable based on broad public education on the safe labelling, storage and use of veterinary products.
-
Prompt treatment with plasmapheresis and/or systemic steroids may be beneficial even in cases where there is a delay in presentation.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors EOL identified the ocular toxicity in the patient on presentation, researched initial management options and created this report. SG made research and designed the table summarising previous reported cases of closantel poisoning. EM guided the treatment plan and monitored the patient, and supervised the writing of this case report.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer